Greece vs Serbia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Greece
1.32
in 2019
Serbia
1.44
in 2018
Greece rank
75th
Serbia rank
72nd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Greece
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.44 against 1.32 in Greece, a difference of 0.12.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 73 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 7 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.05 | -1.77 | 0.7167 | Greece |
| 1950s | -0.6721 | -1.69 | 1.02 | Greece |
| 1960s | -0.0036 | -1.05 | 1.05 | Greece |
| 1970s | 0.3768 | -0.7307 | 1.11 | Greece |
| 1980s | 0.5869 | -0.8008 | 1.39 | Greece |
| 1990s | 0.7037 | -1.51 | 2.21 | Greece |
| 2000s | 0.8714 | 0.252 | 0.6194 | Greece |
| 2010s | 1.08 | 1.43 | 0.3488 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Greece or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.44 against 1.32 in Greece as of 2018.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Greece and Serbia?
- 0.12, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Serbia?
- 73 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2018.
- How do Greece and Serbia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Greece ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.