Greece vs Romania: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Greece
1.32
in 2019
Romania
1.41
in 2019
Greece rank
75th
Romania rank
73rd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Greece
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1.41 against 1.32 in Greece, a difference of 0.09.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 75th and Romania ranks 73rd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 7 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.05 | -1.59 | 0.5375 | Greece |
| 1950s | -0.6721 | -1.43 | 0.7543 | Greece |
| 1960s | -0.0036 | -1.31 | 1.31 | Greece |
| 1970s | 0.3768 | -1.23 | 1.61 | Greece |
| 1980s | 0.5869 | -1.19 | 1.77 | Greece |
| 1990s | 0.7037 | 0.149 | 0.5548 | Greece |
| 2000s | 0.8714 | 0.3831 | 0.4883 | Greece |
| 2010s | 1.1 | 1.17 | 0.0675 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Greece or Romania?
- Romania, at 1.41 against 1.32 in Greece as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Greece and Romania?
- 0.09, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Romania?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Greece and Romania rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Greece ranks 75th and Romania ranks 73rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.