Ghana vs Guatemala: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Ghana
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.4399 against 0.3804 in Ghana, a difference of 0.0595.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1957 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 114th and Guatemala ranks 111th of 193 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -0.0559 | -1.77 | 1.72 | Ghana |
| 1960s | -0.1015 | -1.96 | 1.86 | Ghana |
| 1970s | -0.1888 | -2.26 | 2.07 | Ghana |
| 1980s | -0.3402 | -2.35 | 2.01 | Ghana |
| 1990s | 0.412 | -1.51 | 1.93 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.3625 | -0.1858 | 0.5482 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.3858 | 0.514 | 0.1282 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Ghana or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 0.4399 against 0.3804 in Ghana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Ghana and Guatemala?
- 0.0595, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1957 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Guatemala rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Ghana ranks 114th and Guatemala ranks 111th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.