Equatorial Guinea vs Malawi: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2423 against 0.2204 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0219.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 120th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.61 | -1.36 | 0.2408 | Malawi |
| 1970s | -2.69 | -1.1 | 1.59 | Malawi |
| 1980s | 0.0412 | -0.663 | 0.7042 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | -0.7293 | 0.0073 | 0.7366 | Malawi |
| 2000s | -0.3086 | 0.3012 | 0.6097 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.059 | 0.4666 | 0.4076 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Equatorial Guinea or Malawi?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2423 against 0.2204 in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
- 0.0219, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malawi?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Malawi rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and Malawi ranks 120th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.