El Salvador vs Equatorial Guinea: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.2715 against 0.2423 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0292.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1968 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.4169 | -1.61 | 1.19 | El Salvador |
| 1970s | -1.43 | -2.69 | 1.25 | El Salvador |
| 1980s | -2.43 | 0.0412 | 2.47 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | -0.4929 | -0.7293 | 0.2364 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 0.3134 | -0.3086 | 0.6219 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.373 | 0.059 | 0.314 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, El Salvador or Equatorial Guinea?
- El Salvador, at 0.2715 against 0.2423 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0292, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- El Salvador ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.