Ecuador vs Liberia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Ecuador
- Liberia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.9049 against 0.7772 in Liberia, a difference of 0.1277.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Liberia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 98th and Liberia ranks 100th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.003 | 0.6503 | 0.6473 | Liberia |
| 1950s | -0.0263 | 0.5767 | 0.603 | Liberia |
| 1960s | 0.0049 | 0.7179 | 0.713 | Liberia |
| 1970s | -0.1117 | 0.6426 | 0.7543 | Liberia |
| 1980s | -0.5529 | -0.7399 | 0.187 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | -0.4008 | -1.59 | 1.19 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | -0.1487 | -0.6157 | 0.4671 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.7485 | 0.8703 | 0.1218 | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Ecuador or Liberia?
- Ecuador, at 0.9049 against 0.7772 in Liberia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Ecuador and Liberia?
- 0.1277, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Liberia?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Liberia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Ecuador ranks 98th and Liberia ranks 100th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.