Czechia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Czechia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.63 against 3.34 in Czechia, a difference of 0.29.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Czechia ranks 17th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 193 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -0.6064 | 0.8025 | 1.41 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1980s | -0.5514 | 0.4924 | 1.04 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 1.69 | 1.92 | 0.2317 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 1.92 | 2.55 | 0.6382 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 3.19 | 3.57 | 0.3792 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Czechia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.63 against 3.34 in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.29, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Czechia ranks 17th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.