Cote d'Ivoire vs Guinea: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Cote d'Ivoire
0.0103
in 2019
Guinea
0.0107
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Guinea rank
132nd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.0107 against 0.0103 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0004.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Guinea ranks 132nd of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 4 and Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8311 | -1.35 | 2.18 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 0.7793 | -1.57 | 2.35 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 1.03 | -0.543 | 1.58 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | -0.2644 | -0.5565 | 0.2921 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | -1.46 | -0.5895 | 0.8676 | Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.6148 | 0.0029 | 0.6177 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Cote d'Ivoire or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 0.0107 against 0.0103 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea?
- 0.0004, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Guinea ranks 132nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.