Côte d'Ivoire vs Djibouti: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Côte d'Ivoire
0.0103
in 2019
Djibouti
-0.011
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Djibouti rank
134th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Djibouti
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0103 against -0.011 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0213.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Djibouti ranks 134th of 193 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Djibouti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.6043 | -0.1218 | 0.726 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 1.03 | 0.5466 | 0.4854 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | -0.2644 | -0.329 | 0.0645 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | -1.46 | 0.5349 | 1.99 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | -0.6148 | 0.1879 | 0.8027 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Côte d'Ivoire or Djibouti?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 0.0103 against -0.011 in Djibouti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
- 0.0213, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Djibouti rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Djibouti ranks 134th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.