Cote d'Ivoire vs Cuba: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Cote d'Ivoire
0.0103
in 2019
Cuba
-0.058
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Cuba rank
135th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Cuba
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0103 against -0.058 in Cuba, a difference of 0.0683.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 135th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 4 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8311 | -1.83 | 2.66 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 0.7793 | -1.37 | 2.15 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 1.03 | -1.27 | 2.31 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | -0.2644 | -0.6702 | 0.4058 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | -1.46 | 0.0127 | 1.47 | Cuba |
| 2010s | -0.6148 | -0.0454 | 0.5694 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Cote d'Ivoire or Cuba?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.0103 against -0.058 in Cuba as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Cote d'Ivoire and Cuba?
- 0.0683, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Cuba?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Cuba rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 135th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.