Congo vs Zimbabwe: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Congo
-0.4605
in 2019
Zimbabwe
-0.4662
in 2019
Congo rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
151st

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
-2-101196019892019

How they compare

Congo currently reports -0.4605 against -0.4662 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0057.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s -0.4479 -0.6578 0.2099 Congo
1970s 0.1535 -1.28 1.43 Congo
1980s -0.0177 -1.11 1.09 Congo
1990s -1.18 -0.1301 1.05 Zimbabwe
2000s -0.3157 -1.19 0.8715 Congo
2010s -0.3037 -0.6473 0.3435 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at -0.4605 against -0.4662 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Congo and Zimbabwe?
0.0057, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2019.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Congo ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.