Congo vs Uganda: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Congo
-0.4605
in 2019
Uganda
-0.3959
in 2019
Congo rank
150th
Uganda rank
148th

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Congo
  • Uganda
-3-2-101196019892019

How they compare

Uganda currently reports -0.3959 against -0.4605 in Congo, a difference of 0.0646.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.

Congo ranks 150th and Uganda ranks 148th of 193 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s -0.5109 -0.5988 0.0878 Congo
1970s 0.1535 -2.5 2.65 Congo
1980s -0.0177 -2.33 2.31 Congo
1990s -1.18 -1.25 0.0741 Congo
2000s -0.3157 -1.27 0.9579 Congo
2010s -0.3037 -0.364 0.0603 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Congo or Uganda?
Uganda, at -0.3959 against -0.4605 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Congo and Uganda?
0.0646, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Congo ranks 150th and Uganda ranks 148th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.