Congo vs Madagascar: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Congo
-0.4605
in 2019
Madagascar
-0.4432
in 2019
Congo rank
150th
Madagascar rank
149th

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Congo
  • Madagascar
-2-101196019892019

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports -0.4432 against -0.4605 in Congo, a difference of 0.0173.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Madagascar ahead.

Congo ranks 150th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s -0.4737 1.19 1.66 Madagascar
1970s 0.1535 0.5245 0.371 Madagascar
1980s -0.0177 -0.2528 0.2351 Congo
1990s -1.18 0.0151 1.19 Madagascar
2000s -0.3157 0.4616 0.7773 Madagascar
2010s -0.3037 -0.3517 0.0479 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Congo or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at -0.4432 against -0.4605 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Congo and Madagascar?
0.0173, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Madagascar?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do Congo and Madagascar rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Congo ranks 150th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.