Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eritrea: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
-1.81
in 2019
Eritrea
-1.8
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
186th
Eritrea rank
185th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports -1.8 against -1.81 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.01.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 186th and Eritrea ranks 185th of 193 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.08 | 0.4669 | 2.55 | Eritrea |
| 2000s | -1.86 | -0.634 | 1.22 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -1.82 | -1.45 | 0.3689 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at -1.8 against -1.81 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea?
- 0.01, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 186th and Eritrea ranks 185th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.