Colombia vs Israel: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Colombia
-0.4709
in 2019
Israel
-0.5823
in 2019
Colombia rank
152nd
Israel rank
155th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Colombia
- Israel
How they compare
Colombia currently reports -0.4709 against -0.5823 in Israel, a difference of 0.1114.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 72 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Israel ahead.
Colombia ranks 152nd and Israel ranks 155th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.49 | -0.0926 | 1.39 | Israel |
| 1950s | -1.68 | -0.1525 | 1.53 | Israel |
| 1960s | -1.57 | -0.6375 | 0.9325 | Israel |
| 1970s | -1.62 | -1.05 | 0.5655 | Israel |
| 1980s | -1.82 | -0.9437 | 0.8774 | Israel |
| 1990s | -1.73 | -1.18 | 0.5475 | Israel |
| 2000s | -1.67 | -1.51 | 0.1601 | Israel |
| 2010s | -0.8455 | -0.9288 | 0.0833 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Colombia or Israel?
- Colombia, at -0.4709 against -0.5823 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Colombia and Israel?
- 0.1114, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Israel?
- 72 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and Israel rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Colombia ranks 152nd and Israel ranks 155th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.