Chad vs Dominican Republic: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Chad
-0.1792
in 2019
Dominican Republic
-0.2235
in 2019
Chad rank
142nd
Dominican Republic rank
144th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Chad
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Chad currently reports -0.1792 against -0.2235 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0443.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 142nd and Dominican Republic ranks 144th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.8078 | -0.8861 | 0.0782 | Chad |
| 1970s | -1.28 | -1.04 | 0.2413 | Dominican Republic |
| 1980s | -1.6 | 0.1537 | 1.76 | Dominican Republic |
| 1990s | -1.74 | -0.1915 | 1.55 | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | -1.16 | -0.3986 | 0.7567 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | -0.3884 | -0.2787 | 0.1097 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Chad or Dominican Republic?
- Chad, at -0.1792 against -0.2235 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Chad and Dominican Republic?
- 0.0443, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Dominican Republic?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Dominican Republic rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Chad ranks 142nd and Dominican Republic ranks 144th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.