Central African Republic vs Uganda: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Uganda
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports -0.351 against -0.3959 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0449.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 148th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.7013 | -0.5988 | 0.1025 | Uganda |
| 1970s | -1.19 | -2.5 | 1.31 | Central African Republic |
| 1980s | -0.3139 | -2.33 | 2.01 | Central African Republic |
| 1990s | -0.0292 | -1.25 | 1.22 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | -1.22 | -1.27 | 0.0553 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | -1.39 | -0.364 | 1.03 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Central African Republic or Uganda?
- Central African Republic, at -0.351 against -0.3959 in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Central African Republic and Uganda?
- 0.0449, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Uganda?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Uganda rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Central African Republic ranks 145th and Uganda ranks 148th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.