Central African Republic vs Chad: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports -0.1792 against -0.351 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.1718.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 145th and Chad ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.5657 | -0.8078 | 0.2421 | Central African Republic |
| 1970s | -1.19 | -1.28 | 0.0877 | Central African Republic |
| 1980s | -0.3139 | -1.6 | 1.29 | Central African Republic |
| 1990s | -0.0292 | -1.74 | 1.71 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | -1.22 | -1.16 | 0.063 | Chad |
| 2010s | -1.39 | -0.3884 | 1 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Chad, at -0.1792 against -0.351 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 0.1718, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Central African Republic ranks 145th and Chad ranks 142nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.