Cambodia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Cambodia
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0175 against 0.0103 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0072.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.7 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cambodia ranks 131st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Cote d'Ivoire in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.47 | 0.8311 | 2.31 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | -2.25 | 0.7793 | 3.03 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | -1.51 | 1.03 | 2.54 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | -1.24 | -0.2644 | 0.9714 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | -0.4036 | -1.46 | 1.05 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | -0.0192 | -0.6148 | 0.5956 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Cambodia or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cambodia, at 0.0175 against 0.0103 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0.0072, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Cambodia ranks 131st and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.