Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Serbia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.53 against 1.44 in Serbia, a difference of 0.09.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.3 | -1.58 | 0.2785 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 0.9267 | 0.252 | 0.6747 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 1.41 | 1.43 | 0.0148 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.53 against 1.44 in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 0.09, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.