Bolivia vs Sri Lanka: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Bolivia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.4682 against 0.4203 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0479.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 72 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Bolivia ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 112th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.0278 | 0.6554 | 0.6831 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | -0.0505 | 0.392 | 0.4425 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | -0.165 | 0.0201 | 0.1851 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | -0.6507 | 0.0145 | 0.6652 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | -0.6486 | -1.55 | 0.9041 | Bolivia |
| 1990s | 0.2275 | -1.63 | 1.85 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 0.5666 | -1.3 | 1.87 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 0.962 | -0.5489 | 1.51 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Bolivia or Sri Lanka?
- Bolivia, at 0.4682 against 0.4203 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0479, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sri Lanka?
- 72 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Sri Lanka rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Bolivia ranks 110th and Sri Lanka ranks 112th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.