Bolivia vs Guatemala: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Bolivia
0.4682
in 2019
Guatemala
0.4399
in 2019
Bolivia rank
110th
Guatemala rank
111th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Bolivia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.4682 against 0.4399 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0283.
That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 74 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 111th of 193 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.0203 | -0.3509 | 0.3306 | Bolivia |
| 1950s | -0.0505 | -1.31 | 1.26 | Bolivia |
| 1960s | -0.165 | -1.96 | 1.8 | Bolivia |
| 1970s | -0.6507 | -2.26 | 1.61 | Bolivia |
| 1980s | -0.6486 | -2.35 | 1.7 | Bolivia |
| 1990s | 0.2275 | -1.51 | 1.74 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 0.5666 | -0.1858 | 0.7524 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 0.962 | 0.514 | 0.448 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Bolivia or Guatemala?
- Bolivia, at 0.4682 against 0.4399 in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Bolivia and Guatemala?
- 0.0283, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Guatemala?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Guatemala rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Bolivia ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 111th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.