Bhutan vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Bhutan
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 2.46 against 2.38 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 42nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 39th of 193 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.5 | 1.51 | 0.9895 | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 2.25 | 1.95 | 0.2983 | Bhutan |
| 1990s | -0.1364 | 1.88 | 2.02 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2000s | 1.55 | 1.65 | 0.0969 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 1.78 | 1.96 | 0.1859 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Bhutan or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 2.46 against 2.38 in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Bhutan and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.08, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Bhutan ranks 42nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 39th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.