Benin vs Mongolia: Physical Integrity Rights Score

Benin
0.9407
in 2019
Mongolia
0.9959
in 2019
Benin rank
95th
Mongolia rank
94th

Physical Integrity Rights Score over time

  • Benin
  • Mongolia
-10123194619822019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.9959 against 0.9407 in Benin, a difference of 0.0552.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Mongolia ahead.

Benin ranks 95th and Mongolia ranks 94th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0297 2.96 2.93 Mongolia
1970s -0.0797 2.77 2.85 Mongolia
1980s -0.3364 1.88 2.21 Mongolia
1990s 1.48 1.5 0.0195 Mongolia
2000s 0.9595 0.7831 0.1765 Benin
2010s 0.9511 0.8639 0.0873 Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Benin or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.9959 against 0.9407 in Benin as of 2019.
What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Benin and Mongolia?
0.0552, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Mongolia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do Benin and Mongolia rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
Benin ranks 95th and Mongolia ranks 94th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Physical Integrity Rights Score
Source
Fariss et al. (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 11,139 data points, 1946–2019
Last refreshed

The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.