Belarus vs Mauritania: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Belarus
0.306
in 2019
Mauritania
0.3162
in 2019
Belarus rank
116th
Mauritania rank
115th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Belarus
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0.3162 against 0.306 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0102.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Mauritania ahead.
Belarus ranks 116th and Mauritania ranks 115th of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -0.0038 | -0.3571 | 0.3533 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 0.1656 | -0.2711 | 0.4368 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.1118 | 0.2465 | 0.1347 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 0.2545 | 0.4016 | 0.1471 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Belarus or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 0.3162 against 0.306 in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Belarus and Mauritania?
- 0.0102, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mauritania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Mauritania rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Belarus ranks 116th and Mauritania ranks 115th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.