Austria vs Costa Rica: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Austria
2.25
in 2019
Costa Rica
2.22
in 2019
Austria rank
44th
Costa Rica rank
45th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Austria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2.25 against 2.22 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 44th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.3116 | 0.1432 | 0.1684 | Austria |
| 1950s | 0.3163 | 0.3988 | 0.0825 | Costa Rica |
| 1960s | 0.5736 | 1.22 | 0.6418 | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 1.52 | 1.66 | 0.1412 | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 1.92 | 1.8 | 0.1256 | Austria |
| 1990s | 1.73 | 1.6 | 0.1367 | Austria |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 1.91 | 0.2862 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 2.28 | 1.79 | 0.4965 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Austria or Costa Rica?
- Austria, at 2.25 against 2.22 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Austria and Costa Rica?
- 0.03, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Costa Rica?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Costa Rica rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Austria ranks 44th and Costa Rica ranks 45th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.