Austria vs Bhutan: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Austria
2.25
in 2019
Bhutan
2.38
in 2019
Austria rank
44th
Bhutan rank
42nd
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Austria
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.38 against 2.25 in Austria, a difference of 0.13.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Bhutan ahead.
Austria ranks 44th and Bhutan ranks 42nd of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Bhutan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.3116 | 1.07 | 0.7619 | Bhutan |
| 1950s | 0.3163 | 1.53 | 1.21 | Bhutan |
| 1960s | 0.5736 | 2.16 | 1.58 | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 1.52 | 2.58 | 1.06 | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 1.92 | 2.25 | 0.3326 | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 1.73 | -0.1364 | 1.87 | Austria |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 1.55 | 0.0705 | Austria |
| 2010s | 2.28 | 1.78 | 0.5085 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Austria or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 2.38 against 2.25 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Austria and Bhutan?
- 0.13, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bhutan?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Bhutan rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Austria ranks 44th and Bhutan ranks 42nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.