Australia vs Botswana: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Australia
1.86
in 2019
Botswana
1.89
in 2019
Australia rank
58th
Botswana rank
56th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Australia
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.89 against 1.86 in Australia, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Botswana ahead.
Australia ranks 58th and Botswana ranks 56th of 193 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Botswana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1.55 | 0.5484 | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1.21 | 1.76 | 0.5462 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1.71 | 1.66 | 0.048 | Australia |
| 1990s | 1.7 | 1.37 | 0.3273 | Australia |
| 2000s | 2 | 1.49 | 0.5126 | Australia |
| 2010s | 2.08 | 1.8 | 0.2782 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Australia or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 1.89 against 1.86 in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Australia and Botswana?
- 0.03, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Australia ranks 58th and Botswana ranks 56th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.