Antigua and Barbuda vs Guinea-Bissau: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Antigua and Barbuda
2.09
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
2.14
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
53rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
50th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2.14 against 2.09 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 53rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 193 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.8718 | 0.1614 | 0.7104 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1990s | 1.2 | -0.153 | 1.35 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 0.8135 | 0.7891 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 2 | 1.24 | 0.7646 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Antigua and Barbuda or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 2.14 against 2.09 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.05, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea-Bissau?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 53rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.