Antigua and Barbuda vs Brunei Darussalam: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 2.09 against 1.97 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.12.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Brunei Darussalam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 53rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 54th of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Brunei Darussalam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.9317 | 0.4824 | 0.4492 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1990s | 1.2 | 1.18 | 0.0192 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 2.39 | 0.7902 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 2 | 2.52 | 0.5194 | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Antigua and Barbuda or Brunei Darussalam?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 2.09 against 1.97 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0.12, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 53rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 54th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.