Afghanistan vs Brazil: Physical Integrity Rights Score
Afghanistan
-1.64
in 2019
Brazil
-1.31
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
173rd
Brazil rank
170th
Physical Integrity Rights Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -1.31 against -1.64 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 173rd and Brazil ranks 170th of 193 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Brazil in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.9021 | -0.0727 | 0.9748 | Afghanistan |
| 1950s | 1.18 | -0.2243 | 1.4 | Afghanistan |
| 1960s | 1.17 | -1.02 | 2.19 | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | -0.6487 | -1.28 | 0.6362 | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | -3.11 | -1.09 | 2.02 | Brazil |
| 1990s | -1.94 | -1.33 | 0.6169 | Brazil |
| 2000s | -1.51 | -1.23 | 0.2797 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -1.48 | -1.1 | 0.3785 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical integrity rights score, Afghanistan or Brazil?
- Brazil, at -1.31 against -1.64 in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in physical integrity rights score between Afghanistan and Brazil?
- 0.33, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Brazil?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Brazil rank globally for physical integrity rights score?
- Afghanistan ranks 173rd and Brazil ranks 170th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Fariss et al. (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Physical Integrity Rights Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score captures the extent to which citizens are protected from government killings, torture, political imprisonments, extrajudicial executions, mass killings and disappearances. Large positive scores mean abuses are rare relative to other countries and years, large negative scores that abuses are relatively widespread.