Niger vs Thailand: Participatory Democracy Index

Niger
0.189
in 2025
Thailand
0.186
in 2025
Niger rank
115th
Thailand rank
117th

Participatory Democracy Index over time

  • Niger
  • Thailand
00.10.20.30.40.5178919072025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.189 against 0.186 in Thailand, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Thailand ahead.

Niger ranks 115th and Thailand ranks 117th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 6 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Thailand Difference Ahead
1920s 0.006 0.011 0.005 Thailand
1930s 0.006 0.0215 0.0155 Thailand
1940s 0.0062 0.0293 0.0231 Thailand
1950s 0.0094 0.0251 0.0157 Thailand
1960s 0.0737 0.0267 0.047 Niger
1970s 0.0644 0.045 0.0194 Niger
1980s 0.0715 0.1074 0.0359 Thailand
1990s 0.1915 0.1733 0.0182 Niger
2000s 0.3217 0.2063 0.1154 Niger
2010s 0.379 0.1389 0.2401 Niger
2020s 0.282 0.1427 0.1393 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participatory democracy index, Niger or Thailand?
Niger, at 0.189 against 0.186 in Thailand as of 2025.
What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Niger and Thailand?
0.003, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Thailand?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Niger and Thailand rank globally for participatory democracy index?
Niger ranks 115th and Thailand ranks 117th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participatory Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,363 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.