Moldova vs Senegal: Participatory Democracy Index
Moldova
0.389
in 2025
Senegal
0.402
in 2025
Moldova rank
66th
Senegal rank
63rd
Participatory Democracy Index over time
- Moldova
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.402 against 0.389 in Moldova, a difference of 0.013.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Senegal ahead.
Moldova ranks 66th and Senegal ranks 63rd of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.0392 | 0.0463 | 0.0072 | Senegal |
| 1910s | 0.0384 | 0.047 | 0.0086 | Senegal |
| 1940s | 0.0194 | 0.0893 | 0.0699 | Senegal |
| 1950s | 0.02 | 0.1121 | 0.0921 | Senegal |
| 1960s | 0.0495 | 0.178 | 0.1285 | Senegal |
| 1970s | 0.0637 | 0.1938 | 0.1301 | Senegal |
| 1980s | 0.0709 | 0.2641 | 0.1932 | Senegal |
| 1990s | 0.2893 | 0.336 | 0.0467 | Senegal |
| 2000s | 0.2814 | 0.4098 | 0.1284 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0.386 | 0.4347 | 0.0487 | Senegal |
| 2020s | 0.475 | 0.4237 | 0.0513 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory democracy index, Moldova or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 0.402 against 0.389 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Moldova and Senegal?
- 0.013, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Senegal?
- 102 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Senegal rank globally for participatory democracy index?
- Moldova ranks 66th and Senegal ranks 63rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.