Libya vs Uzbekistan: Participatory Democracy Index
Libya
0.087
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0.082
in 2025
Libya rank
149th
Uzbekistan rank
150th
Participatory Democracy Index over time
- Libya
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.087 against 0.082 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.005.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 150th of 176 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 6 and Uzbekistan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.049 | 0.0198 | 0.0292 | Libya |
| 1940s | 0.049 | 0.019 | 0.03 | Libya |
| 1950s | 0.0579 | 0.02 | 0.0379 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.0668 | 0.0495 | 0.0173 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.0448 | 0.0637 | 0.0189 | Uzbekistan |
| 1980s | 0.044 | 0.0709 | 0.0269 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 0.044 | 0.0583 | 0.0143 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0439 | 0.0451 | 0.0012 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.1707 | 0.0432 | 0.1275 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.1333 | 0.0713 | 0.062 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory democracy index, Libya or Uzbekistan?
- Libya, at 0.087 against 0.082 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 0.005, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Uzbekistan rank globally for participatory democracy index?
- Libya ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 150th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.