Libya vs Somalia: Participatory Democracy Index

Libya
0.087
in 2025
Somalia
0.095
in 2025
Libya rank
149th
Somalia rank
146th

Participatory Democracy Index over time

  • Libya
  • Somalia
00.10.20.3190019622025

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.095 against 0.087 in Libya, a difference of 0.008.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 146th of 176 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Somalia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Somalia Difference Ahead
1930s 0.049 0.018 0.031 Libya
1940s 0.049 0.0175 0.0315 Libya
1950s 0.0579 0.0874 0.0296 Somalia
1960s 0.0668 0.1313 0.0645 Somalia
1970s 0.0448 0.0441 0.0007 Libya
1980s 0.044 0.0472 0.0032 Somalia
1990s 0.044 0.064 0.02 Somalia
2000s 0.0439 0.0787 0.0348 Somalia
2010s 0.1707 0.087 0.0837 Libya
2020s 0.1333 0.0908 0.0425 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participatory democracy index, Libya or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.095 against 0.087 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Libya and Somalia?
0.008, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Somalia?
83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
How do Libya and Somalia rank globally for participatory democracy index?
Libya ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 146th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participatory Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,363 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.