Guinea vs Laos: Participatory Democracy Index
Guinea
0.12
in 2025
Laos
0.118
in 2025
Guinea rank
136th
Laos rank
139th
Participatory Democracy Index over time
- Guinea
- Laos
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.12 against 0.118 in Laos, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 136th and Laos ranks 139th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 9 and Laos in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.043 | 0.014 | 0.029 | Guinea |
| 1910s | 0.043 | 0.014 | 0.029 | Guinea |
| 1920s | 0.043 | 0.014 | 0.029 | Guinea |
| 1930s | 0.043 | 0.014 | 0.029 | Guinea |
| 1940s | 0.0507 | 0.0224 | 0.0283 | Guinea |
| 1950s | 0.066 | 0.0713 | 0.0053 | Laos |
| 1960s | 0.0603 | 0.0749 | 0.0146 | Laos |
| 1970s | 0.053 | 0.0809 | 0.0279 | Laos |
| 1980s | 0.0637 | 0.0887 | 0.025 | Laos |
| 1990s | 0.1368 | 0.0912 | 0.0456 | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.1807 | 0.0915 | 0.0892 | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.2325 | 0.0994 | 0.1331 | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.1447 | 0.1147 | 0.03 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory democracy index, Guinea or Laos?
- Guinea, at 0.12 against 0.118 in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Guinea and Laos?
- 0.002, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Laos?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Laos rank globally for participatory democracy index?
- Guinea ranks 136th and Laos ranks 139th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.