Egypt vs Libya: Participatory Democracy Index

Egypt
0.076
in 2025
Libya
0.087
in 2025
Egypt rank
151st
Libya rank
149th

Participatory Democracy Index over time

  • Egypt
  • Libya
00.10.20.3178919072025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.087 against 0.076 in Egypt, a difference of 0.011.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Libya ahead.

Egypt ranks 151st and Libya ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Libya Difference Ahead
1930s 0.0403 0.049 0.0087 Libya
1940s 0.043 0.049 0.006 Libya
1950s 0.0318 0.0579 0.0261 Libya
1960s 0.0373 0.0668 0.0295 Libya
1970s 0.0773 0.0448 0.0325 Egypt
1980s 0.0871 0.044 0.0431 Egypt
1990s 0.0828 0.044 0.0388 Egypt
2000s 0.0793 0.0439 0.0354 Egypt
2010s 0.0716 0.1707 0.0991 Libya
2020s 0.0765 0.1333 0.0568 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participatory democracy index, Egypt or Libya?
Libya, at 0.087 against 0.076 in Egypt as of 2025.
What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Egypt and Libya?
0.011, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Libya?
83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Libya rank globally for participatory democracy index?
Egypt ranks 151st and Libya ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participatory Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,363 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.