Congo vs Vietnam: Participatory Democracy Index

Congo
0.188
in 2025
Vietnam
0.164
in 2025
Congo rank
116th
Vietnam rank
119th

Participatory Democracy Index over time

  • Congo
  • Vietnam
00.10.20.3190319642025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.188 against 0.164 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.024.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Vietnam's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.

Congo ranks 116th and Vietnam ranks 119th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Vietnam in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Vietnam Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0777 0.1573 0.0795 Vietnam
1980s 0.1056 0.1546 0.049 Vietnam
1990s 0.2128 0.1678 0.045 Congo
2000s 0.1307 0.1679 0.0372 Vietnam
2010s 0.1466 0.1697 0.0231 Vietnam
2020s 0.1955 0.1643 0.0312 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participatory democracy index, Congo or Vietnam?
Congo, at 0.188 against 0.164 in Vietnam as of 2025.
What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Congo and Vietnam?
0.024, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Vietnam?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Congo and Vietnam rank globally for participatory democracy index?
Congo ranks 116th and Vietnam ranks 119th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participatory Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,363 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.