Chad vs Jordan: Participatory Democracy Index

Chad
0.129
in 2025
Jordan
0.132
in 2025
Chad rank
131st
Jordan rank
128th

Participatory Democracy Index over time

  • Chad
  • Jordan
00.050.10.15192019722025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.132 against 0.129 in Chad, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.

Chad ranks 131st and Jordan ranks 128th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Jordan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Jordan Difference Ahead
1920s 0.015 0.0372 0.0222 Jordan
1930s 0.015 0.041 0.026 Jordan
1940s 0.0194 0.0434 0.024 Jordan
1950s 0.0366 0.0564 0.0198 Jordan
1960s 0.0638 0.05 0.0138 Chad
1970s 0.0568 0.0493 0.0075 Chad
1980s 0.0489 0.0558 0.0069 Jordan
1990s 0.111 0.0788 0.0322 Chad
2000s 0.1344 0.0816 0.0528 Chad
2010s 0.1277 0.1098 0.0179 Chad
2020s 0.1138 0.1228 0.009 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher participatory democracy index, Chad or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.132 against 0.129 in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Chad and Jordan?
0.003, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Jordan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Chad and Jordan rank globally for participatory democracy index?
Chad ranks 131st and Jordan ranks 128th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Participatory Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,363 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.