Cambodia vs Palestine, State of: Participatory Democracy Index
Cambodia
0.06
in 2025
Palestine, State of
0.055
in 1948
Cambodia rank
153rd
Palestine, State of rank
156th
Participatory Democracy Index over time
- Cambodia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.06 against 0.055 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.005.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Palestine, State of's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 153rd and Palestine, State of ranks 156th of 176 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.018 | 0.054 | 0.036 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | 0.0187 | 0.0642 | 0.0455 | Palestine, State of |
| 1930s | 0.019 | 0.064 | 0.045 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.0209 | 0.062 | 0.0411 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher participatory democracy index, Cambodia or Palestine, State of?
- Cambodia, at 0.06 against 0.055 in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in participatory democracy index between Cambodia and Palestine, State of?
- 0.005, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Cambodia and Palestine, State of rank globally for participatory democracy index?
- Cambodia ranks 153rd and Palestine, State of ranks 156th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Participatory Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which citizens can engage in regional and local government, civil society organizations, and direct democracy.