How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?

226 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs Chinese Taipei: Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled

Lithuania

0.712

in 2025

Chinese Taipei

0.704

in 2025

Lithuania rank

27th

Chinese Taipei rank

28th

Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled over time

Lithuania
Chinese Taipei

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.712 against 0.704 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 226 shared years of data; in 1795 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 28th of 176 countries.

Across the 24 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 19 and Chinese Taipei in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	Chinese Taipei	Difference	Ahead
1790s	0.014	0.013	0.001	Lithuania
1800s	0.0149	0.013	0.0019	Lithuania
1810s	0.015	0.013	0.002	Lithuania
1820s	0.0142	0.013	0.0012	Lithuania
1830s	0.0147	0.013	0.0017	Lithuania
1840s	0.0152	0.013	0.0022	Lithuania
1850s	0.0215	0.0121	0.0094	Lithuania
1860s	0.0637	0.0132	0.0505	Lithuania
1870s	0.0866	0.014	0.0726	Lithuania
1880s	0.0411	0.014	0.0271	Lithuania
1890s	0.0412	0.013	0.0282	Lithuania
1900s	0.0499	0.038	0.0119	Lithuania
1910s	0.0839	0.04	0.0439	Lithuania
1920s	0.3375	0.0461	0.2914	Lithuania
1930s	0.1374	0.0421	0.0953	Lithuania
1940s	0.0144	0.0355	0.0211	Chinese Taipei
1950s	0.0196	0.0542	0.0346	Chinese Taipei
1960s	0.0232	0.0611	0.0379	Chinese Taipei
1970s	0.0247	0.0732	0.0485	Chinese Taipei
1980s	0.0352	0.1192	0.084	Chinese Taipei
1990s	0.745	0.3408	0.4042	Lithuania
2000s	0.7622	0.6789	0.0833	Lithuania
2010s	0.7727	0.6995	0.0732	Lithuania
2020s	0.7298	0.7158	0.014	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled, Lithuania or Chinese Taipei?: Lithuania, at 0.712 against 0.704 in Chinese Taipei as of 2025.
What is the difference in key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled between Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?: 0.008, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?: 226 years are reported by both, from 1795 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Chinese Taipei rank globally for key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled?: Lithuania ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Chinese Taipei: Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/key-features-of-liberal-democracy-gaps-filled/lithuania/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/key-features-of-liberal-democracy-gaps-filled/lithuania/taiwan/">Lithuania vs Chinese Taipei: Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Key features of liberal democracy, gaps filled
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 28,729 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Key features of liberal democracy with 58 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.