Libya vs Niger: Key features of electoral democracy

Libya
0.193
in 2025
Niger
0.227
in 2025
Libya rank
137th
Niger rank
134th

Key features of electoral democracy over time

  • Libya
  • Niger
00.20.40.6178919072025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.227 against 0.193 in Libya, a difference of 0.034.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 95 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.

Libya ranks 137th and Niger ranks 134th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0.014 0.015 0.001 Niger
1930s 0.014 0.016 0.002 Niger
1940s 0.014 0.016 0.002 Niger
1950s 0.0818 0.0643 0.0174 Libya
1960s 0.1232 0.1872 0.064 Niger
1970s 0.072 0.1304 0.0584 Niger
1980s 0.072 0.0988 0.0268 Niger
1990s 0.072 0.3987 0.3267 Niger
2000s 0.0719 0.5448 0.4729 Niger
2010s 0.2769 0.5487 0.2718 Niger
2020s 0.212 0.4038 0.1918 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key features of electoral democracy, Libya or Niger?
Niger, at 0.227 against 0.193 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in key features of electoral democracy between Libya and Niger?
0.034, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Niger?
95 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Libya and Niger rank globally for key features of electoral democracy?
Libya ranks 137th and Niger ranks 134th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key features of electoral democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key features of electoral democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.