Guyana vs Honduras: Electoral Democracy Index

Guyana
0.515
in 2025
Honduras
0.511
in 2025
Guyana rank
82nd
Honduras rank
83rd

Electoral Democracy Index over time

  • Guyana
  • Honduras
00.20.40.6183819312025

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.515 against 0.511 in Honduras, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Honduras ahead.

Guyana ranks 82nd and Honduras ranks 83rd of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 10 and Honduras in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Honduras Difference Ahead
1900s 0.2088 0.141 0.0678 Guyana
1910s 0.2209 0.161 0.0599 Guyana
1920s 0.222 0.16 0.062 Guyana
1940s 0.2378 0.1614 0.0764 Guyana
1950s 0.2455 0.2075 0.038 Guyana
1960s 0.3187 0.1571 0.1616 Guyana
1970s 0.2992 0.1606 0.1386 Guyana
1980s 0.268 0.3512 0.0832 Honduras
1990s 0.4254 0.525 0.0996 Honduras
2000s 0.5729 0.5358 0.0371 Guyana
2010s 0.623 0.4085 0.2145 Guyana
2020s 0.5057 0.483 0.0227 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electoral democracy index, Guyana or Honduras?
Guyana, at 0.515 against 0.511 in Honduras as of 2025.
What is the difference in electoral democracy index between Guyana and Honduras?
0.004, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Honduras?
102 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Guyana and Honduras rank globally for electoral democracy index?
Guyana ranks 82nd and Honduras ranks 83rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Electoral Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electoral Democracy Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.