Hong Kong vs Niger: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Hong Kong
0.219
in 2025
Niger
0.214
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
111th
Niger rank
112th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Hong Kong
- Niger
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.219 against 0.214 in Niger, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 111th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 7 and Niger in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0971 | 0.055 | 0.0421 | Hong Kong |
| 1930s | 0.0998 | 0.059 | 0.0408 | Hong Kong |
| 1940s | 0.0971 | 0.0648 | 0.0323 | Hong Kong |
| 1950s | 0.1187 | 0.0715 | 0.0472 | Hong Kong |
| 1960s | 0.1238 | 0.1431 | 0.0193 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.1745 | 0.145 | 0.0295 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 0.2252 | 0.1452 | 0.08 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 0.3148 | 0.2959 | 0.0189 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.3255 | 0.377 | 0.0515 | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.3029 | 0.3818 | 0.0789 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.2223 | 0.297 | 0.0747 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Hong Kong or Niger?
- Hong Kong, at 0.219 against 0.214 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Hong Kong and Niger?
- 0.005, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Niger rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Hong Kong ranks 111th and Niger ranks 112th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.