Hong Kong vs Jordan: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Hong Kong
0.219
in 2025
Jordan
0.211
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
111th
Jordan rank
113th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Hong Kong
- Jordan
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.219 against 0.211 in Jordan, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 111th and Jordan ranks 113th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0971 | 0.1344 | 0.0373 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.0998 | 0.136 | 0.0362 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.0971 | 0.1372 | 0.0401 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.1187 | 0.1532 | 0.0345 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.1238 | 0.1505 | 0.0267 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.1745 | 0.1484 | 0.0261 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 0.2252 | 0.1535 | 0.0717 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 0.3148 | 0.1971 | 0.1177 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.3255 | 0.1785 | 0.147 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0.3029 | 0.2067 | 0.0962 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.2223 | 0.2043 | 0.018 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Hong Kong or Jordan?
- Hong Kong, at 0.219 against 0.211 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Hong Kong and Jordan?
- 0.008, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Jordan rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Hong Kong ranks 111th and Jordan ranks 113th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.