Cuba vs Hong Kong: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Cuba
0.224
in 2025
Hong Kong
0.219
in 2025
Cuba rank
109th
Hong Kong rank
111th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Cuba
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.224 against 0.219 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 109th and Hong Kong ranks 111th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 9 and Hong Kong in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.1085 | 0.096 | 0.0125 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 0.1174 | 0.096 | 0.0214 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 0.1145 | 0.0969 | 0.0176 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 0.115 | 0.0998 | 0.0152 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.1665 | 0.0971 | 0.0694 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 0.119 | 0.1187 | 0.0003 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0.2166 | 0.1238 | 0.0928 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.2168 | 0.1745 | 0.0423 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.224 | 0.2252 | 0.0012 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 0.2299 | 0.3148 | 0.0849 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.2294 | 0.3255 | 0.0961 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0.2382 | 0.3029 | 0.0647 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.238 | 0.2223 | 0.0157 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Cuba or Hong Kong?
- Cuba, at 0.224 against 0.219 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Cuba and Hong Kong?
- 0.005, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hong Kong?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Hong Kong rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Cuba ranks 109th and Hong Kong ranks 111th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.