Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Congo
0.107
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
0.113
in 2025
Congo rank
155th
Saudi Arabia rank
152nd
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Congo
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.113 against 0.107 in Congo, a difference of 0.006.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1932 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 155th and Saudi Arabia ranks 152nd of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 7 and Saudi Arabia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.028 | 0.0279 | 0.0001 | Congo |
| 1940s | 0.0316 | 0.028 | 0.0036 | Congo |
| 1950s | 0.0432 | 0.0422 | 0.001 | Congo |
| 1960s | 0.0992 | 0.0562 | 0.043 | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.0555 | 0.0739 | 0.0184 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 0.0567 | 0.1038 | 0.0471 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 0.1446 | 0.1089 | 0.0357 | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0915 | 0.1012 | 0.0097 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.1066 | 0.1048 | 0.0018 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.134 | 0.11 | 0.024 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Congo or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.113 against 0.107 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Congo and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.006, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saudi Arabia?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1932 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Congo ranks 155th and Saudi Arabia ranks 152nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.