Comoros vs Hong Kong: Egalitarian Democracy Index
Comoros
0.222
in 2025
Hong Kong
0.219
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Hong Kong rank
111th
Egalitarian Democracy Index over time
- Comoros
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0.222 against 0.219 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Comoros ranks 110th and Hong Kong ranks 111th of 175 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.045 | 0.096 | 0.051 | Hong Kong |
| 1910s | 0.0452 | 0.096 | 0.0508 | Hong Kong |
| 1940s | 0.0605 | 0.1067 | 0.0462 | Hong Kong |
| 1950s | 0.0656 | 0.1187 | 0.0531 | Hong Kong |
| 1960s | 0.077 | 0.1238 | 0.0468 | Hong Kong |
| 1970s | 0.1281 | 0.1745 | 0.0464 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 0.1525 | 0.2252 | 0.0727 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 0.2662 | 0.3148 | 0.0486 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.2666 | 0.3255 | 0.0589 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 0.2833 | 0.3029 | 0.0196 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.221 | 0.2223 | 0.0013 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian democracy index, Comoros or Hong Kong?
- Comoros, at 0.222 against 0.219 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian democracy index between Comoros and Hong Kong?
- 0.003, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Hong Kong?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Hong Kong rank globally for egalitarian democracy index?
- Comoros ranks 110th and Hong Kong ranks 111th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, as well as the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.