Sweden vs Uruguay: Democracy Index

Sweden
10
in 2018
Uruguay
10
in 2018
Sweden rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Democracy Index over time

  • Sweden
  • Uruguay
-10-50510180019092018

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 10 against 10 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 189 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Uruguay ahead.

Sweden ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 8 and Uruguay in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s -8 -3 5 Uruguay
1840s -7.2 -3 4.2 Uruguay
1850s -6 -3 3 Uruguay
1860s -5 -3 2 Uruguay
1870s -4 -3 1 Uruguay
1880s -4 -3 1 Uruguay
1890s -4 -3 1 Uruguay
1900s -3.3 -1.2 2.1 Uruguay
1910s 6.5 2.1 4.4 Sweden
1920s 10 3 7 Sweden
1930s 10 1.2 8.8 Sweden
1940s 10 0 10 Sweden
1950s 10 6.4 3.6 Sweden
1960s 10 8 2 Sweden
1970s 10 -4.6 14.6 Sweden
1980s 10 1.1 8.9 Sweden
1990s 10 10 0
2000s 10 10 0
2010s 10 10 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Sweden or Uruguay?
Sweden, at 10 against 10 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Sweden and Uruguay?
0, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uruguay?
189 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Sweden and Uruguay rank globally for democracy index?
Sweden ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).