Philippines vs United Kingdom: Democracy Index

Philippines
8
in 2018
United Kingdom
8
in 2018
Philippines rank
52nd
United Kingdom rank
52nd

Democracy Index over time

  • Philippines
  • United Kingdom
-10-50510180019092018

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 8 against 8 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

Across all 81 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 52nd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1930s 5 10 5 United Kingdom
1940s 2.43 10 7.57 United Kingdom
1950s 5 10 5 United Kingdom
1960s 4.7 10 5.3 United Kingdom
1970s -6.8 10 16.8 United Kingdom
1980s -1.7 10 11.7 United Kingdom
1990s 8 10 2 United Kingdom
2000s 8 10 2 United Kingdom
2010s 8 9.33 1.33 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy index, Philippines or United Kingdom?
Philippines, at 8 against 8 in United Kingdom as of 2018.
What is the difference in democracy index between Philippines and United Kingdom?
0, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United Kingdom?
81 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
How do Philippines and United Kingdom rank globally for democracy index?
Philippines ranks 52nd and United Kingdom ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy Index
Source
Polity 5 (2020); Population based on various sources (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 18,392 data points, 1776–2020
Last refreshed

It combines information on the extent to which open, multi-party, and competitive elections choose a chief executive who faces comprehensive institutional constraints, and political participation is competitive. It ranges from -10 to 10 (fully democratic).